We have a ton of neurons. And each of those neurons has many dendrites. And each dendrite has countless little dendritic spines. Thinking about how complex one single neuron is in order to receive a signal from another cell gives me an identity crisis. What if we are all just little dendritic spines on our universe’s neuron?! Was that stupid stampede for Walmart’s Black Friday sale worth it for those folks? Was my self-restraint when faced with leftover pumpkin pie worth it? Is any of it worth it?! Dendritic spines are small actin-rich protrusions on a neuron’s dendrite, the structure that receives information from other neurons. The morphology and density of the dendritic spines can be regulated by neurotransmitters, actin dynamics, and actin-regulating proteins. The neuron-specific actin regulator cortactin-binding protein 2 (CTTNBP2) regulates the formation and maintenance of dendritic spines, and is even associated with autism spectrum disorder. A recent paper investigates the role of a CTTNBP2 homologue, CTTNBP2NL (CTTNBP2 N-terminal-like protein). Chen and colleagues found that while CTTNBP2 expression is found in the brain, CTTNBP2NL is not. In addition, CTTNBP2NL does not appear to play a role in dendritic spine formation. Although both CTTNBP2 and CTTNBP2NL associate with cortactin, a well-studied actin regulator, CTTNBP2 is associated with the cell’s cortex while CTTNBP2NL is found on actin stress fibers. In addition, Chen and colleagues found a link between CTTNBP2 and the protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) complex, specifically with CTTNBP2 targeting the PP2A complex to dendritic spines. In the images above, cells show labels for cortactin (red) and actin fibers (blue). CTTNBP2NL (green, top) associates with stress fibers (arrows), while CTTNBP2 (green, bottom) is distributed around the cortex (arrowheads). Chen, Y., Chen, C., Hu, H., & Hsueh, Y. (2012). CTTNBP2, but not CTTNBP2NL, regulates dendritic spinogenesis and synaptic distribution of the striatin-PP2A complex Molecular Biology of the Cell, 23 (22), 4383-4392 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E12-05-0365
Every year, Nikon hosts the Small World competition, which pits stunning microscopy images against one another for oooohs and aaaahs from around the world. The images are breathtaking, for both scientists and lay-folk alike So, to kick off a brief Thanksgiving break, I wanted to send you all to the 2012 winners of the Small World competition, announced a few weeks ago. Click here for the Small World winners and honorable mentions...and lose an afternoon to image browsing, microscope jealousy, and pride in the amazing advances within the microscopy field. Happy Thanksgiving, everyone! Thanks for reading HighMag!
When you were still developing, your brain was an overachiever just like that straight-A class president with perfect teeth and a canned food drive. Your brain overproduced neurons, then later paired down the neuron population to fine-tune development and function. Today’s image is from a paper that describes this process and the regulation behind it.
Interneurons are neurons that make connections with other neurons, and are found throughout our bodies. In our brain, our cortical neurons are produced far away from their final destination in the fully mature brain. It has been suggested that these neurons are overproduced, and then migrate to the cortex where the excess neurons are eliminated. A recent paper shows this process occurring in developing mice. Southwell and colleagues showed this developmental cell death occurring within the developing mouse brain, within laboratory cultures, and within cortical neurons transplanted into a developing mouse brain. Their results suggest that the cell death is triggered cell-autonomously (from within the cell) or triggered due to competition between other interneurons for survival signals. The image above shows interneuron precursor cells cultured on a plate of cortical feeder layers containing neurons (green), astrocytes (red), and oligodendrocytes (white). About 30% of the cortical interneurons cultured on these feeder layers later underwent cell death.
It is Election Day here in the US, which means that some of us need stress relief until the results are tallied. So, maybe you can imagine the graceful membrane dynamics of a cell and let their lava-lamp-like groove lull you into a happy place. Today’s image is from a paper describing the regulation of caveola biogenesis. Caveolae are small invaginations on a cell’s plasma membrane that play important roles in cell signaling and endocytosis (the uptake of material into a cell). Caveolae depend on proteins called caveolins, but the details of caveola biogenesis are not completely understood. A recent paper describes results showing the importance of phosphorylation of Caveolin-1 (Cav1) in the formation of caveolae. Phosphorylation is the addition of a phosphate group to a protein, which functions as a molecular switch to change the protein’s activity. Joshi and colleagues found that the phosphorylation of Cav1 induces a feedback loop that links together mechanical stress on the cell, caveola biogenesis, and focal adhesion regulation at the cell’s membrane. These results place Cav1 on a list of critical proteins that help a cell respond to mechanical stress. In the images above, mutations of Cav1 that mimic phosphorylation (Cav1Y14R and Cav1Y14D) cause the formation of more caveolae and caveolae clusters (arrows and asterisks) than control cells (Cav1WT).
Joshi, B., Bastiani, M., Strugnell, S., Boscher, C., Parton, R., & Nabi, I. (2012). Phosphocaveolin-1 is a mechanotransducer that induces caveola biogenesis via Egr1 transcriptional regulation originally published in the Journal of Cell Biology, 199 (3), 425-435 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201207089
Despite being a scientist, sci-fi/fantasy is just not my cup of tea. Sometimes, though, I am positive that a scientific name is really some Klingon starship or Game of Throne character. Ever since I learned about the nodes of Ranvier in high school biology, I have been sure that they’re really from some fantasy world. Today’s image is from a paper that doesn’t really dispel my confusion...the concept of measuring and understanding high nerve conduction velocity in teeny tiny axons is other-worldly.